Sebastian N.

My feedback

  1. 119 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone,

    With PowerShell 6.0, we’ve already begun updating our versioning system to be more descriptive. Right now, PSVersion returns 6.0.0-alpha as a System.Management.Automation.SemanticVersion object (with Major, Minor, Patch, and Label properties), and we’ve also added a GitCommitId property to PSVersionTable that matches perfectly with tags on GitHub: https://github.com/powershell/powershell/tags

    Still, we can definitely continue to improve the semantic version implementation. You can track (and contribute to!) the discussion on these improvements here: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/issues/2354

    Thanks,
    Joey

    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    I assume querying the default namespace works fine? I'll try to query another system later today to check if I get the same behaviour.

    It'd be good to know what OS, PS and .Net FW versions are installed on your client and the sccm machine.

  3. 0 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PowerShell » Other PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    Yep, as they said you're passing the hashtable as parameter to the path parameter (New-ModuleManifest $psd1) instead of specifying it as splatting variable (New-ModuleManifest @psd1).

    The error message tells you that.

  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    a) the WMF 5 RTM release has superseeded the WMF 5 Production Preview
    b) the WMF 5 RTM release now (as of 19th Dec 2015) supports client operating systems in addition to server operating systems
    c) Windows 10 users only have to install the 1511 update in order to update their PSv5 version to the same version as the one in WMF 5 RTM

    source: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/wmf/releasenotes

  5. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Networking » DHCP  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
  6. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Diagnostics » Misc  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    What Ivan said.

  7. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  IIS and Web Server Role  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    I don't know if you can change the title but from I understand you're asking the IIS team for an update tof he tooling to allow the creation of self signed certificates that use the SHA256 or even SHA512 signature algorithm. The web server itself can use SHA256 certificates just fine - haven't tried SHA512 though.

    So the title should be 'Provide tooling to create SHA256 Self Signed Certificates'

  8. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Active Directory » Management Tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
  9. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    This is actually something that Microsoft are working on. It's been shown in one of their presentations. I guess it'll ship with Server 2016, who knows if it'll back backported though.

  10. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    Roy, DSC has been around for two years now, you better check it out.

  11. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  General Feedback » Shell, GUI, & Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    You know, you can just document the commands once and have a look at the documentation, just saying.

  12. 250 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  General Feedback » Shell, GUI, & Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback. This is something that has been suggested frequently, and we are hearing you. At this time no decision has been made either way.

    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    What Dave Ackroyd said, since one does not always need the .Net Framework on a server PowerShell (with its .Net dependency) is not installed by default.

  13. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  General Feedback » Misc  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
  14. 165 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  General Feedback » Licensing, SKU, & Edition  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
  15. 116 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  General Feedback » Licensing, SKU, & Edition  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
  16. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  General Feedback » Applications & Add-ons  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    Yeah, then don't install the full gui and opt for server core or server core with minimal server interface instead:

    https://redmondmag.com/articles/2015/02/05/~/media/ECG/redmondmag/Images/2015/02/150205ServerCore_lg.ashx

  17. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  General Feedback » Shell, GUI, & Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    There are 3 implementation methods for Windows Server:
    - Server Core
    - Server Core with Minimal Server Interface
    - Server with GUI

    https://redmondmag.com/articles/2015/02/05/~/media/ECG/redmondmag/Images/2015/02/150205ServerCore_lg.ashx

    I don't see the point of stripping the minimal server gui since that basically leaves you with server core. Server with GUI shouldn't be touched at all since its full GUI experience is required for Terminal Server farms.

  18. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  General Feedback » Shell, GUI, & Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 
  19. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Core Server » Management tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. commented  · 

    Telnet is an outdated insecure management approach that should not be implemented anymore, especially since there's PowerShell remoting and soon SSH as well.

  20. 115 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Core Server » Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sebastian N. supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base