Daniel Sutton

My feedback

  1. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core Server » Management tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  2. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    Support the idea of device guard but applocker would be over kill in my opion. Whats apps would it actually be blocking?

  4. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Core Server » Management tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    dev's always trying to say things are good suggestions when it there own stuff :)

    seriously though sysmon should just be default on everything

  5. 135 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Core Server » Applications & addons  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    Please get reporting services running on core first.

    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  6. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Active Directory » Logon, Passwords  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Networking » NIC  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    really needed for nano

  8. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  9. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  10. 118 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  11. 437 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    AD, DHCP, DC, CA and Remote Access are all I want for Christmas. Currently deploy all as core but really want nano as next step.

    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  12. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Core Server » Management tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    Defo not, telnet is insecure and dated.

  13. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Core Server  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  14. 51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  15. 115 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Core Server » Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    Can see this happening. Would allow HyperV hosts to be disk free like VMware.

    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  16. 31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Core Server » Roles & features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton supported this idea  · 
  17. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Core Server » Applications & addons  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel Sutton commented  · 

    would this not be more connect to the windows IOT build.

Feedback and Knowledge Base