ArieH

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH shared this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ArieH commented  · 

    I think a better idea would be to separate the initial registration timer and the others.
    You do not want your lcm to report every minute and do consistency check every minute, that will cause huge amount of "noise" on the server logs and in the network towards the pull server. Think farms of 100's servers.

    At the moment you dont have to wait for registration, you just force an update on the node and it will contact the pull server.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ArieH commented  · 

    I think a better idea would be to separate the initial registration timer and the others.
    You do not want your lcm to report every minute and do consistency check every minute, that will cause huge amount of "noise" on the server logs and in the network towards the pull server. Think farms of 100's servers.

    At the moment you dont have to wait for registration, you just force an update on the node and it will contact the pull server.

  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » Microsoft.PowerShell.* Modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH shared this idea  · 
  7. 51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  5 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ArieH commented  · 

    Can this be done today via using File/Registry in one resource and having a second resource that has also DependsOn the first one and then reading the file ?

    Or something like using a $Public:Var in the Test section, will this be avilable during the Set section as well , as Set calls Test so its in the same "session (?)"

  8. 202 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    After much discussion with Aaron Nelson and Chrissy LeMaire, and thanks to the enormous amount of support for this item, we’ve recognized that this is something we need to accomplish, one way or another.

    We don’t want to offer an ETA on this as the work is not well understood by our team yet, and no one currently has immediate bandwidth on starting that investigation. But I want to stress the fact that is an important ask that we’re taking seriously as a priority.

    In the meantime, it would be immensely useful if someone with expertise in the DataTable space could submit an RFC (basically a brief spec) to our PowerShell-RFC repository on GitHub. That way, we can have a discussion about what the design of a ConvertTo-DataTable cmdlet might look like before we dive in on an implementation. The process for doing so is located here: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell-RFC/blob/master/RFC0000-RFC-Process.md#draft

    I…

    ArieH supported this idea  · 
  9. 64 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH supported this idea  · 
  10. 80 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH supported this idea  · 
  11. 98 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  Mark Gray responded

    Justin,

    We totally understand that a robust Pull server / central management solution is something that is critical to your success with DSC. We have invested quite heavily in Azure Automation DSC (AA DSC) to fill many of these needs. With that said, I would be very interested to understand if the AA DSC solution does not work for you (and other customers) and why? Vote and comment if this is important to you.

    Also interesting feedback on our ‘bad ideas’. Thanks!

    MarkG

    ArieH supported this idea  · 
  12. 54 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    survey  ·  Mark Gray responded

    Thanks for the feedback, Sebastian! I have changed the status to survey to get a better feel for how important this is for customers in general.

    MarkG

    ArieH supported this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  0 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ArieH shared this idea  · 
  14. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    survey  ·  Mark Gray responded

    Justin,

    Thank you for your feedback! We recognize that this adds confusion to the deployment of the WMF 5.0 pull server and are looking into a solution.

    MarkG

    ArieH supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base