Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Virtualization » Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 357 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  Virtualization » Management tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Virtualization » Management tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtualization » VMConnection & remoting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtualization  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtualization  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtualization » Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Virtualization » Guest capabilities  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Tim, if you follow your approach and change the vswitch it will rename the adapter that will make applications dependant on that name fail.

    I think just doing like vmware that user Network Adapter 0, 1, 2, 3 is fine. Also moving VLAN id definition from network adapter to vswitch.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base