Richard Schaefer

My feedback

  1. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  0 comments  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Gallery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Specific ask for the voters: If you are willing, please add a note what your expectations are, and how you would see this providing extra value in the Gallery when we display this content.

    This type of feature is something we are generally a little bit cautious about.
    Rendering active MD content can include links & other items that result in some amount of risk for users of a site.

    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  2 comments  ·  PowerShell » Other PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  5. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  4 comments  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  6. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PowerShell » Microsoft.PowerShell.* Modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Would be interested in understanding the scenario where you are using the cmdlet & specifying the reason for rebooting. To explain: our previous assumption was that users would EITHER use the server UI that captured this information, OR use the cmdlet (often so they didn’t need to supply that reason text).
    So, what would help is to understand in what situations the cmdlet is being used and specifying the reboot explanation is desirable.

    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  7. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  PowerShell » Microsoft.PowerShell.* Modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    survey  ·  Zachary Alexander responded

    We don’t own the creation of modules for operating system features. I’ll mark this as Survey so we can provide this information to the WU team, but you might also want to consider filing this in the Windows 10 Feedback Hub. Also, see the community-created PSWindowsUpdate link below :)

    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  8. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PowerShell » Package Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The issues you have encountered can be frustrating, sorry that is the case for you.

    Moving this to Survey to try to gauge the scope of the problem for users generally.

    We are somewhat limited by security requirements: what ships with Windows will always be tagged so that nothing can replace it easily unless it is signed by Microsoft. While Pester is part of Windows, it is not owned or developed by Microsoft, so updates delivered via the Gallery cannot be Microsoft signed.

    Once the Gallery version is installed on a system, -SkipPublisherCheck is no longer required for future updates. That first experience, however, is bad.

    This leaves us with a dilemma: do we stop shipping Pester in with PowerShell in the future, or do we continue to provide the feature set knowing users who update from the Gallery will encounter these issues?

    Looking for feedback from as many users…

    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  11. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PowerShell » Microsoft.PowerShell.* Modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  12. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  13. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PowerShell » Package Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  14. 200 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    After much discussion with Aaron Nelson and Chrissy LeMaire, and thanks to the enormous amount of support for this item, we’ve recognized that this is something we need to accomplish, one way or another.

    We don’t want to offer an ETA on this as the work is not well understood by our team yet, and no one currently has immediate bandwidth on starting that investigation. But I want to stress the fact that is an important ask that we’re taking seriously as a priority.

    In the meantime, it would be immensely useful if someone with expertise in the DataTable space could submit an RFC (basically a brief spec) to our PowerShell-RFC repository on GitHub. That way, we can have a discussion about what the design of a ConvertTo-DataTable cmdlet might look like before we dive in on an implementation. The process for doing so is located here: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell-RFC/blob/master/RFC0000-RFC-Process.md#draft

    I…

    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  15. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  1 comment  ·  PowerShell » Other PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  16. 55 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    survey  ·  Zachary Alexander responded

    Thank you for your input. Based on its current ranking compared to other feedback items and product schedule, work on this item is pending (and will be driven by) further customer input.

    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  17. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  1 comment  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  18. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  19. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  0 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Gallery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
  20. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PowerShell » Microsoft.PowerShell.* Modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    survey  ·  Zachary Alexander responded

    changing to Survey based on Joonas’ comment below – request is to have a flag to force TLS 1.2.

    Richard Schaefer supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base