Hi, Thank you very much for your Feedback!
I already had a look on this doc, but i couldn't find the feature, which fails from the unhealthy client to the healthy client. So it's like weight-based application-load-balancing, but it is a failover. If a client is not available (=unhealthy), the DNS switches automaticly to the other healthy client. This allows in a small local network a Failover, but no necessarily a load-balancer - of Course, most time you will loadbalance. I hope you understand what we're looking for and can help us.
Hi, Thank you very much for your Feedback!
I already had a look on this doc, but i couldn't find the feature, which fails from the unhealthy client to the healthy client. So it's like weight-based application-load-balancing, but it is a failover. If a client is not available (=unhealthy), the DNS switches automaticly to the other healthy client. This allows in a small local network a Failover, but no necessarily a load-balancer - of Course, most time you will loadbalance. I hope you understand what we're looking for and can help us.