WSLUser

My feedback

  1. 82 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Management Tools » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  2. 138 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Management Tools » Windows Admin Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  3. 214 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Management Tools » Windows Admin Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  4. 111 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Management Tools » Group Policy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  5. 165 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  9 comments  ·  Management Tools » Windows Admin Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  6. 233 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Management Tools » Windows Admin Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  7. 608 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  55 comments  ·  Management Tools » Windows Admin Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  8. 381 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Management Tools » Windows Admin Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  9. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  10. 64 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PowerShell » Package Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  11. 117 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    survey  ·  Mark Gray responded

    Thanks for the feedback! I have personally heard this request from a number of customers. IMHO having the ability to use GMS accounts would be a quite useful in DSC configurations. If this is an important feature for you as well, vote it up so that we can appropriately prioritize it as we move forward.

    MarkG

    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  12. 73 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  13. 79 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  14. 97 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    survey  ·  Mark Gray responded

    Justin,

    We totally understand that a robust Pull server / central management solution is something that is critical to your success with DSC. We have invested quite heavily in Azure Automation DSC (AA DSC) to fill many of these needs. With that said, I would be very interested to understand if the AA DSC solution does not work for you (and other customers) and why? Vote and comment if this is important to you.

    Also interesting feedback on our ‘bad ideas’. Thanks!

    MarkG

    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  15. 119 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone,

    With PowerShell 6.0, we’ve already begun updating our versioning system to be more descriptive. Right now, PSVersion returns 6.0.0-alpha as a System.Management.Automation.SemanticVersion object (with Major, Minor, Patch, and Label properties), and we’ve also added a GitCommitId property to PSVersionTable that matches perfectly with tags on GitHub: https://github.com/powershell/powershell/tags

    Still, we can definitely continue to improve the semantic version implementation. You can track (and contribute to!) the discussion on these improvements here: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/issues/2354

    Thanks,
    Joey

    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  16. 139 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PowerShell » Desired State Configuration (DSC)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    investigating  ·  Mark Gray responded

    Your votes on this and other features helps us in our feature prioritization.

    Thank you!!

    MarkG

    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  17. 153 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  PowerShell » ISE and tooling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  18. 171 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  PowerShell » Microsoft.PowerShell.* Modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  19. 178 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
  20. 201 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  PowerShell » PowerShell Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    After much discussion with Aaron Nelson and Chrissy LeMaire, and thanks to the enormous amount of support for this item, we’ve recognized that this is something we need to accomplish, one way or another.

    We don’t want to offer an ETA on this as the work is not well understood by our team yet, and no one currently has immediate bandwidth on starting that investigation. But I want to stress the fact that is an important ask that we’re taking seriously as a priority.

    In the meantime, it would be immensely useful if someone with expertise in the DataTable space could submit an RFC (basically a brief spec) to our PowerShell-RFC repository on GitHub. That way, we can have a discussion about what the design of a ConvertTo-DataTable cmdlet might look like before we dive in on an implementation. The process for doing so is located here: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell-RFC/blob/master/RFC0000-RFC-Process.md#draft

    I…

    WSLUser supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base