Tim Cerling

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Storage » Misc  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Cerling commented  · 

    It would be helpful if you would update your post to actually describe what the issue is that you think needs improving in 2016. Posting pictures of links, not even clickable links, means someone will need to manually type in all those different links to see if they can figure out what you are asking for. And, it would be even better if you were to post the results of your own tests on 2016 that prompted you to make this suggestion.

  2. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Essentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Cerling commented  · 

    RE: giving an app vendor admin rights. Look into Just Enough Admin - https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Just-Enough-Administration-6b5ad370 The app vendor would need to define the specific privileges needed and for what programs. Then just enough admin privileges are granted for that particular task and nothing else.

  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Clustering » Topology  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Cerling commented  · 

    It would be helpful to explain what you mean. I'm sure it made all the sense in the world to you, but your terse descriptions leave a lot of question marks.
    For example, anti-affinity already exists for resources that should avoid being on the same node. How is that not sufficient for your second example? And, I'm not sure at all what you mean by Active/Active groups. Active/Active clusters have been available since day one, but not all applications can run A/A. So is this a cluster issue or something else? Please elaborate.

  4. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Clustering » Topology  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Cerling commented  · 

    Could you provide more information on this request? I do not recall ever having to enable firewall rules to get clustering to work. I can understand that there may be environments that want to add firewall rules for their particular environment, but that is different from having to enable firewall rules for a feature to work.

  5. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Storage » SMB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim Cerling shared this idea  · 
  6. 250 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  General Feedback » Shell, GUI, & Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback. This is something that has been suggested frequently, and we are hearing you. At this time no decision has been made either way.

    Tim Cerling supported this idea  · 
2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base