Eric Wendel

My feedback

  1. 726 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Storage » Deduplication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eric Wendel supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Storage » Backup/Restore  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eric Wendel commented  · 

    Can't you just use perfmon to see transfer rate?

  3. 228 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Storage » Deduplication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eric Wendel commented  · 

    Windows Dedupe is the best implementation on the market. Post process is far superior to inline implementations. Who wants to burn CPU cycles on dedupe when workloads are busiest? Variable chunk sizes increase efficiency by at least 15% over everything else I've tested.

    That said, I really DO need to have a means of searching for files (at least by filenames if not by indexed content) such that the search results include the RPs.

    Please add this feature!

    Eric Wendel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base